A boardroom review is a method that allows a table to assess boardroombook.com/5-effective-communication-skills-in-meetings/ its performance in a thorough manner. It assists tables in identifying weaknesses in their leadership and culture as well as the facets of longevity. It also ensures that those who pay for table membership are able to fulfill their duties.
This research area is still developing and many difficulties remain. The current empirical evidence shows mixed results regarding how dissent affects boards and their function. Some studies provide positive (Zona 2016,) curvilinear, not significant, or mixed results. Others find negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. There are 2012) connections between dissent and task performance of a board.
The literature does not provide a deeper understanding of the elements that impact the dissension’s dynamics. Future research should create a more integrated theoretical approach to contextualize this governance phenomenon. This could involve the use of configurational approaches (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018; Schiell Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to help researchers better understand how board attributes as well as processes and contexts relate to necessary and sufficient causality in governance phenomenon.
Finally, a number of studies use the definition of dissent as narrow and do not disclose precise measurement methods. These studies are therefore susceptible to measurement error. Therefore, it would be worthwhile for future studies to come up with more reliable and precise dissent measurement methods.